By Thomas H. Clarke

DENVER, CO — A bill that would establish DUI limits for marijuana users in Colorado passed a second House reading Tuesday, and now needs only one final vote on the floor of the House to advance to the Senate.

House Bill 1114, introduced by Rep. Mark Waller (R-Colorado Springs), would allow drivers to be considered impaired if their blood contains more than 5 nanograms of THC per milliliter.

However, unlike previous bills that have failed in previous sessions, the 5 nanogram limit is not per se, meaning that defendants charged under the statute who possess THC/blood levels above this threshold could continue to provide evidence in criminal court indicating that they did not present a legitimate traffic safety risk, rather than being considered guilty as a result of the test reading.

“For example, if you did not exhibit poor driving, you can put that on as evidence to say, ‘Look my driving was not poor, I’m not unsafe to operate a motor vehicle,’” Rep. Waller said at a hearing on the bill.

“This is about traffic safety in the state of Colorado,” said bill co-sponsor Rep. Rhonda Fields (D-Aurora). “This bill will send a very strong message that no longer can you get behind the wheel after smoking marijuana.”

House Bill 1114 was approved by the House Committee on the Judiciary and was then assigned Colorado House Committee on Appropriations.

On Monday, the House Committee on Appropriations approved the bill, sending it to the floor of the House for a floor vote.

The Legislature has tried and failed three times to pass a driving-high blood standard.  Previous attempts at passing similar legislation passed in the House, but failed in the Senate.

Tagged with:
 

By Thomas H. Clarke

police traffic stop

DENVER, CO — A bill that would establish DUI limits for marijuana users in Colorado has been sent to the floor of the Colorado House, where it could see a vote this week.

House Bill 1114, introduced by Rep. Mark Waller (R-Colorado Springs), would allow drivers to be considered impaired if their blood contains more than 5 nanograms of THC per milliliter.

However, unlike previous bills that have failed in previous sessions, the 5 nanogram limit is not per se, meaning that defendants charged under the statute who possess THC/blood levels above this threshold could continue to provide evidence in criminal court indicating that they did not present a legitimate traffic safety risk, rather than being considered guilty as a result of the test reading.

House Bill 1114 was approved by the House Committee on the Judiciary and was then assigned Colorado House Committee on Appropriations.

On Monday, the House Committee on Appropriations approved the bill, sending it to the floor of the House, where it is expected to be scheduled for debate and a floor vote.

The Legislature has tried and failed three times to pass a driving-high blood standard.  Previous attempts at passing similar legislation passed in the House, but failed in the Senate.

 

Source: http://www.thedailychronic.net/2013/16813/marijuana-dui-bill-sent-to-colorado-house-floor-for-vote/

Tagged with:
 

DENVER, CO – The agency charged with regulating Colorado’s medical marijuana industry has not adequately defined its mission, squandered money on capital projects and underreported tax revenues, state auditors said in a scathing report released on Tuesday.

The Medical Marijuana Enforcement Division, a division of Colorado’s Department of Revenue, failed to follow the framework laid out by the state legislature when lawmakers approved the program in 2010, auditors said in the 96-page report.

The emblem of the State of Colorado Medical Marijuana Enforcement Division is seen in their offices in Denver“The division has not adequately defined the oversight activities it must perform or determined the resources it needs to implement the regulatory system envisioned by the General Assembly,” the report said.

The Medical Marijuana Enforcement Division did not immediately respond to calls seeking comment on the report. But revenue department officials agreed with its recommendations, the report said.

The report noted that the agency experienced 19 straight months of net losses, including a $2.3 million loss in June 2011 because of “large capital purchases,” including furniture, computers and a software program that failed to materialize.

Funding for the division has “fluctuated significantly,” since it was established, auditors said, as revenues have declined by 56 percent from $8.6 million to $3.8 million. Expenditures during the same time have increased by 11 percent from $4.7 million to $5.2 million.

The drop in revenue was largely due to a moratorium on new dispensaries from mid-2010 through 2012, which meant the division collected fewer fees.

“Weaknesses in the division’s fee-setting, strategic planning and expense controls contributed to its funding problems,” the report said.

Colorado voters approved the use of medical marijuana in 2000, and last fall voted to legalize small amounts of pot for recreational use. State lawmakers are in the process of crafting a bill that would establish a regulatory framework for the use of recreational marijuana.

Staff layoffs at the revenue department contributed to the underreporting of about $760,000 due the state in tax revenues from 56 of Colorado’s more than 1,400 medical marijuana dispensaries, auditors said.

Additionally, regulators spent $1.1 million in 2011 and 2012 on a marijuana plant tracking computer system that “not does currently exist” because the agency lacked the remaining $400,000 to pay the vendor to implement the system.

Michael Elliott, executive director of the Medical Marijuana Industry Group, blamed the legislature for the oversight problems identified in the report.

“Our members follow the law and expect state officials to give the Medical Marijuana Enforcement Division the budget it needs to ensure proper enforcement,” Elliot said in a statement. “We want more inspectors and oversight of the industry.”

Auditors recommended the revenue department streamline its licensing procedures, step up monitoring activities, and improve the way it seizes and disposes of unauthorized marijuana.

The report also said the division should impose spending controls over expenses and the staff use of state-owned vehicles.

 

Source: http://www.thedailychronic.net/2013/16614/colorados-medical-marijuana-enforcement-division-fails-audit/

Tagged with:
 

by Erik Altieri

Lets Be HonestIn an interview with the Denver Post, published this week, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi spoke about the marijuana legalization initiatives passed in Colorado and Washington in November.

When asked, “What are the measures in Washington (DC) that might address states that legalize marijuana and what is your view of federal policy?,” Minority Leader Pelosi expressed her support of state laws regarding marijuana and encouraged a tax and regulate policy:

Q: What are the measures in Washington (DC) that might address states that have taken steps to legalize marijuana and what is your view of the federal role?

Rep. Pelosi: I support the leadership of Jared Polis, who has been a leader on this issue as well as other members..I understand some of the Republican members support the law now that is passed, even if they didn’t before.

But in any case, to answer your question, what is my position regarding the states that have medical marijuana or recreational marijuana as the law of their states: I think that has to be respected. I think tax and regulate.

In order to do that, there has to be a level of respect for the fact, that if you are going to have recreational marijuana, someone is in business to do that and they have to have tax treatment in order for them to function as a business.

How the state of Colorado interacts with the federal government on the taxation issues is something they have to work out, but I think they should.

You can view the full interview here.

Representative Pelosi now joins the growing list of prominent politicians who are coming out in support of rational marijuana policy. Take a minute of your time and click here to easily contact your Representative and urge him or her to support Representative Polis’ legislation, HR 499: The Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act of 2013, and put an end to our nation’s war on cannabis consumers.

Jeremy P. Meyer, The Denver Post

Denver City Council over the next few months will be faced with decisions over recreational pot that one councilman believes could change the face of the city forever.

Should Denver allow private marijuana-smoking clubs that could make the city a mecca for pot users from around the world?

“That is the key issue,” said Councilman Charlie Brown, who leads a special committee looking at licensing recreational-marijuana sales in Denver. “Do we want Denver to become a pot-tourist spot? Is that going to be a reality? What do you think when you think ‘Amsterdam’? You think marijuana. And there is no doubt that is what Denver will become.”

On Monday afternoon, the Amendment 64 committee is scheduled to hear from opponents and proponents of allowing commercial sales of recreational marijuana. Fifteen minutes are being set aside to hear public comments.

In May, the committee will take an informal vote on whether Denver should opt out on licensing recreational-marijuana sales, something several surrounding communities already have done.

Brown doesn’t think that will occur in Denver.

Two-thirds of the city’s voters in November approved Amendment 64, which legalized recreational marijuana for adults older than 21. The city also has become a leader in the regulation of medical marijuana. Now, 207 licensed medical-marijuana dispensaries operate in Denver; the city has 204 liquor stores.

“I just can’t imagine the council opting out on what the city voted for,” Brown said.

This week, recommendations from Colorado’s Amendment 64 Implementation Task Force are expected to be released. And the council will hear from city officials who were on the task force: council members Mary Beth Susman and Chris Nevitt, and Tom Downey, director of excise and licensing.

Council members also will hear from Dr. Christian Thurstone, president of the Colorado Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Society and medical director of one of Colorado’s largest youth substance-abuse-treatment clinics. Then, Christian Sederberg, a lawyer who helped write Amendment 64, will present his side.

Finally, Diane Carlson-Robinson, co-founder of Bravetracks, a nonprofit that helps Colorado high school students with professional and personal opportunities, will give her views.

Jeremy P. Meyer: 303-954-1367, jpmeyer@denverpost.com or twitter.com/jpmeyerdpost

Tagged with:
 

Pot Tourism in Colo.? Marijuana Regulators OK Idea

On February 20, 2013, in News, by Dee

By KRISTEN WYATT Associated Press
DENVER February 20, 2013 (AP)
Marijuana tourism is on the way to Colorado, under a recommendation made Tuesday by a state task force to regulate the drug made legal by voters last year.

But Colorado should erect signs in airports and borders telling visitors they can’t take pot home, the task force recommended.

Colorado’s marijuana task force was assembled to suggest regulations for pot after voters chose to flout federal drug law and allow its use without a doctor’s recommendation. Made up of lawmakers, law enforcement authorities and marijuana activists, the task force agreed Tuesday that the constitutional amendment on marijuana simply says that adults over 21 can use the drug, not just Colorado residents. If lawmakers agree with the recommendation, tourists would be free to buy and smoke marijuana.

“Imposing a residency requirement would almost certainly create a black market for recreational marijuana in the state,” said Rep. Dan Pabon, a Denver Democrat who sits on the task force.

Tourists could see purchasing caps though, possibly as low as an eighth of an ounce per transaction.

Afraid that marijuana tourism could open the door for traffickers to load up and take it across state borders for illegal sale, task force members agreed that non-residents should be able to buy only limited amounts, though a specific amount wasn’t set.

“Marijuana purchased in Colorado must stay in Colorado,” Pabon warned.

“We could attract greater federal scrutiny and displeasure of our neighbors,” if marijuana flows across state lines, he said.

Task force members were less successful agreeing to recommendations on marijuana growing and public use. Colorado’s marijuana law allows home growing but requires plants to be in a locked, secure location out of public view. The task force couldn’t agree whether a “locked” and “secure” location would mean a backyard surrounded by a fence, or whether an enclosure such as a shed or greenhouse should be mandatory.

One of the task force’s most vocal marijuana critics, Greenwood Village Police Chief John Jackson, worried that backyard pot gardens would need more than a chain-link fence to keep kids out.

Not all task force members agreed. User advocate Meg Sanders said the covering requirement wouldn’t be fair to rural Coloradans.

“I think it goes too far in restricting what people can do on their own private property,” Sanders said.

Public use also prompted a dispute that wasn’t resolved Tuesday. Jackson and others wanted to ban marijuana use on publicly visible patios, porches and backyard. Marijuana activists chafed.

“So I can drink a beer on my porch? But I can’t smoke a joint?” asked marijuana advocate Christian Sederberg.

State Sen. Cheri Jahn, D-Wheat Ridge, said lawmakers would hesitate to regulate something legal people do on private property. What about backyard grills that send the smell of hamburgers into the nose of a neighbor who’s vegetarian?, she asked.

“I don’t know how far we want to go telling people what they can’t do on their own porches,” she said.

The porch marijuana question was left unsettled. Task force members also put off a decision on proposals from Jackson to exempt law enforcement from maintaining marijuana and marijuana plants seized during criminal investigations.

Potency and labeling recommendations for commercial marijuana will also be discussed later.

The task force has until Feb. 28 to recommend marijuana regulations, which will ultimately be set by the state Legislature and the Department of Revenue, the agency which oversees gambling and alcohol and will also regulate recreational pot.

———

Kristen Wyatt can be found on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/APkristenwyatt

Tagged with:
 
Jeremy P. Meyer, The Denver Post, Denver Post

Denver City Council has only a few months to figure out how the state’s most populated city will regulate recreational marijuana or whether it will even allow it.

“Is Denver going to opt out,” asked Councilman Charlie Brown, who is chairing a special committee set up to figure out what Denver is going to do. “I can’t imagine we won’t. It’s called the will of the voters.”

Amendment 64 passed in November, legalizing recreational marijuana in Colorado for adults over 21 years old. But several counties and municipalities already have opted out on allowing pot to be sold.

Sixty-six percent of Denver voters approved Amendment 64.

“What we need to do is balance our own beliefs,” Brown said. “How do we balance our own personal beliefs on this issue? I voted against it. I am sure there are others on council who didn’t vote for it. But there is a will of the voters. We are a representative democracy.”

The city has 207 licensed medical marijuana dispensaries, which is more than the 204 liquor stores licensed in the city. Denver also has created one of the most thorough regulatory structures in the country. But there is a question of how many recreational marijuana businesses would open or would they partner with the medical marijuana dispensaries?

How would that look since the medical pot shops are for people 18 and older who have state-approved cards and the recreational shops are for those 21 and over?

“Do we have to do a lot of heavy lifting here,” Brown said. “We have already established what many people think is the model. The framework is there.”

On Monday’s meeting, the council’s special committee will hold its second meeting.

Denver Police Chief Robert White will talk about any criminal problems from the dispensaries. Denver’s Treasurer Steve Ellington will talk about how much money the new industry could bring into the city. Department of Excise and Licensing Manager Tom Downey will talk about regulatory issues.

The committee will also hear from a representative of the city’s neighborhood coalition that voted on rules that it would like to see for the recreational pot shops, including prohibiting the businesses 1,000 feet from schools or another pot business.

And the committee will also hear from an owner of one of the medical marijuana businesses who will talk about what is working and what is not.

Jeremy P. Meyer: 303-954-1367, jpmeyer@denverpost.com or twitter.com/jpmeyerdpost

Tagged with:
 

Jordan Steffen, The Denver Post, Denver Post

A healthy marijuana plant should have lots of shoots, healthy roots and plenty of leaves.

But the more than 20 people Saturday who attended THC University’s first class, Growing Marijuana 101, learned that growing a healthy and fruitful marijuana plant is far from easy.

The sold-out class offered students the basics of growing marijuana at home, including information about watering, proper lighting, different containers and optional accessories. At the end of the five-hour class, students had the option of touring the growing operation at the Denver dispensary Karmaceuticals.

THC University co-founders Matt Jones, 24, and Freeman LaFleur, 25, said they had been looking for a way to enter the industry for the past couple of years.

“When Amendment 64 passed, we saw this industry that is going to go boom and no education to go with it,” Jones said.

Under Amendment 64, people 21 and older in Colorado can legally use and possess up to 1 ounce of marijuana and grow up to six marijuana plants.

Christopher and Ginger Grider drove to Colorado from New Mexico to take the class. Ginger Grider uses medical marijuana to help treat lupus, fibromyalgia and post-traumatic stress disorder. The couple wants to learn how to grow at home.

“I want to know what I am getting and how it is grown,” Ginger Grider said.

The class was held in a classroom in the Tivoli Student Union on the Auraria campus but was not associated with any accredited university. As a condition of holding the class on campus, where the use and possession of marijuana are not allowed, students saw demonstrations on tomato plants instead of marijuana plants.

In addition to holding more classes in March, Jones and LaFleur are working to create Job Board, a system where students who complete certificate programs can connect with dispensaries and other marijuana businesses that are looking for employees. Currently, the law does not require any certification to grow marijuana plants.

Recreational stores, where legal recreational marijuana can be sold, will not open for about another year.

“We’re trying to create standards in the industry so people can get consistency,” LaFleur said.

Ian Banister, who attended Saturday’s class, said he is considering starting his own growing operation.

“Obviously, there’s an interest,” Banister said. “There’s a lot going on, and I want to make sure I get it right.”

Jordan Steffen: 303-954-1794, jsteffen@denverpost.com or twitter.com/jsteffendp

Tagged with:
 

By William Breathes

According to a Washington state police officer, state trooper and toxicologist, there hasn’t been any noticeable increase in arrests for driving under the influence of marijuana since a bill legalizing small amounts of marijuana went into effect in December.

 

The three testified before the Washington House Public Safety Committee yesterday as part of the ongoing discussion/implementation of Initiative 502, which legalized possession and consumption of up to an ounce of marijuana (as well as edibles and other “infused products”) for adults over 21. The law also set a blood-THC limit of five nanograms for every milliliter of whole blood – a level many said was too low to take into account higher tolerances for medical marijuana patients.

 

washington trooper.jpg
Washington State Trooper Lt. Rob Sharpe testifies Wednesday.

The committee’s job is to iron out any kinks in the system to keep this mythical rash of stoned-to-the-point-of-impairment drivers off the road. That’s not to say that such things don’t happen. They do. In fact, about one in six people arrested for driving while intoxicated involve marijuana according to Washington State Toxicologist Fiona Couper, who also testified. On average, those cases are higher than the .5 nanogram limit, she said. But she also noted that some cases are much higher, into the 70s and 80s. Even then, about half of the cases involving marijuana usually have something else in the mix that could be impairing driving, like booze or meth.

Most DUI stops, according to Olympia police officer Brian Wiley, are for alcohol. “It’s by far the most dominant influence at my municipal level.” Wiley’s testimony was also interesting for other reasons, including his position that passengers have every right to be puffing tough. He talks about how he wouldn’t necessarily pull someone over simply for seeing them holding a joint. He equated it to seeing them holding a beer, which is a $75 open container ticket: just because someone is holding the beer doesn’t mean they are drunk.

“If a person drives by me and there’s a bunch of smoke pouring out the window, no I can’t pull them over for that,” Wiley testified. “It might make me wonder, and I might pull in behind them and see how they are operating their car that day. But it doesn’t give me probable cause to stop them.”

Much of the discussion focused on how long marijuana would stay in people’s system (it varies) and how long people remain impaired. Several attorneys testified that DUI cases involving just marijuana were rare, and that most involved alcohol.

Then there was the testimony from Dr. Marilyn Huestis, who apparently studies cannabis and it’s effects on the human body. She refuted what Sewell said, adding that her quackery research shows that impairment can lastup to 21 days after using marijuana based on “residual THC in the brain”. Thankfully there are huge bodies of cannabinoid science refute what she says, including work from Yale University scientists like Andrew Sewell.

Sewell, who told the committee that there is no direct link between blood THC levels and how impaired someone might be. Getting stoned drivers off the road, he says, isn’t going to be accomplished with arbitrary blood levels. (Editors note: can someone get Sewell to talk to legislators in Colorado?)

Source:  http://www.tokeofthetown.com/2013/02/washington_cops_and_courts_say_thc_duis_not_going_up_since_i-502.php

Tagged with:
 

By Associated Press

SEATTLE — An effort is building in Congress to change U.S. marijuana laws, including moves to legalize the industrial production of hemp and establish a hefty federal pot tax.While passage this year could be a longshot, lawmakers from both parties have been quietly working on several bills, the first of which Democratic Reps. Earl Blumenauer of Oregon and Jared Polis of Colorado plan to introduce Tuesday, Blumenauer told The Associated Press.
Polis’ measure would regulate marijuana the way the federal government handles alcohol: In states that legalize pot, growers would have to obtain a federal permit. Oversight of marijuana would be removed from the Drug Enforcement Administration and given to the newly renamed Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Marijuana and Firearms, and it would remain illegal to bring marijuana from a state where it’s legal to one where it isn’t.The bill is based on a legalization measure previously pushed by former Reps. Barney Frank of Massachusetts and Ron Paul of Texas.Blumenauer’s bill would create a federal marijuana excise tax of 50 percent on the “first sale” of marijuana — typically, from a grower to a processor or retailer. It also would tax pot producers or importers $1,000 annually and other marijuana businesses $500.

His office said Monday it doesn’t yet have an estimate of how much the taxes might bring in. But a policy paper Blumenauer and Polis are releasing this week suggests, based on admittedly vague estimates, that a federal tax of $50 per ounce could raise $20 billion a year. They call for directing the money to law enforcement, substance abuse treatment and the national debt.

Last fall’s votes in Colorado and Washington state to legalize recreational marijuana should push Congress to end the 75-year federal pot prohibition, Blumenauer said.

Washington state officials have estimated that its legal marijuana market could bring in about half a billion dollars a year in state taxes.

“You folks in Washington and my friends in Colorado really upset the apple cart,” Blumenauer said. “We’re still arresting two-thirds of a million people for use of a substance that a majority feel should be legal. … It’s past time for us to step in and try to sort this stuff out.”

Advocates who are working with the lawmakers acknowledge it could take years for any changes to get through Congress, but they’re encouraged by recent developments. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell last week came out in support of efforts to legalize hemp in his home state of Kentucky, and U.S. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., is expected to introduce legislation allowing states to set their own policy on marijuana.

Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., has indicated he plans to hold a hearing on the conflict between state and federal marijuana laws and has urged an end to federal “mandatory minimum” sentences that lead to long prison stints for drug crimes.

“We’re seeing enormous political momentum to undo the drug war failings of the past 40 years,” said Bill Piper, director of national affairs for the Drug Policy Alliance, who has been working with lawmakers on marijuana-related bills. “For the first time, the wind is behind our back.”

Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/apnewsbreak-a-federal-pot-tax-broad-effort-building-in-congress-to-change-marijuana-laws/2013/02/04/e06ed046-6f00-11e2-b35a-0ee56f0518d2_story_1.html

Tagged with: